Subject : What is NET ART?
Interviewer : sang-yoon Lee / blindsound
director
Interviewees :
- Joachim Blank / Germany / What is netart ;-)?
- Natalie Bookchin / USA / Digtal Revolution?
- Alexei Shoulgin / Russia / Art, Power, and Communication
- Natalie Bookchin & Alexei Shoulgin / Introduction to net.art (1994-1999)
- Grahame Weinbren / Germany / The Digital Revolution is a Revolution
of Random Access
- Robert Adrian / net.art on nettime
- David Farmer / Interactive creative writing
- Josephine Bosma / Netherlands / Is it a commercial? Is it spam?
It is net.art!
- Eduardo Kac / USA / Interactive ART on the internet
- Dieter Daniels / Germany / Utopia - what for?
- Lev Manovich / USA / On Totalitarian Interactivity
- Geert Lovink / Holland / From Speculative Media Theory To Net Criticism
- Randall Packer / USA / Eulogy for the Utopian Dream of the Net
- Vuk Cosic / Slovenia / Art was only a substitute for the Internet
- Steve.dietz / USA / Curating (on) the Web Museums in an Interface
Culture
- Critical Arts Ensemble / USA / "Utopian Promises, Net Realities"
Questions 1. WHAT IS NETART? There is a clear distinction between
Media Art and NetArt, which is found upon the use of the network and
electronic communication. What is your definition of NetArt?
Interesting question which I hadn't focused on before. I guess I
would see the distinction being two-fold.
First is the obvious bandwidth/lowest common denominator issue with
any general publishing on the internet - that restricts a "broad audience"
work requiring technology beyond the current general availability. Here
the propogation of browser versions and add-ins like Flash and Shockwave
are important.
The second distinction is the flip-side, less discussed and more
interesting - that on the net the work is available to all, simultaneously.
It is both an invitation to interaction on a scale never before possible
and a challenge to make the work accessible to the world's diverse population.
2. NETART vs. ART ON NET. There are two kinds of works of Art exist
on the web, NetArt and Art on Net. Please explain the differences between
those two and further your answer by telling us your opinions on their
future.
Oops. I have sort of answered that above. I think I will leave the
definition of art to others, especially to those that do it rather than
just talk about it.
NetArt will predominate. Interaction and universal access will become
critical components of communication.
3. Art and Entertainment. The information distribution system has been
and still is experiencing tremendous changes due to the growth of Internet
use. More fields of studies and genres are being introduced on the net
everyday and, especially, entertainment devices, such as network games,
MP3s, net movies and etc, are easily accessible to many users. Please
tell us what you think are some differences between the art before Internet
and the art afterwards which is influenced by this new medium and its
entertaining devices.
I think a major distinction is worth making between the mass commercial
developments and the non-commercial or individual art forms that appear.
While I like many of the commercial developments, these are clearly
the result of a merged voice, and generally from a distinctly western
big business culture. It seems to me that one of the liberations of
the internet is that it also allows an easier media for individual,
idiosyncratic voices to use to be heard. While we have had poets and
public speakers in the past, the web allows such a greater access range.
And it should allow the precise and narrow searching that is necessary
to find the gems amongst the burgeoning web. Importantly it also empowers
the introverts and reflectors who might never have stood up in a crowd,
but can work away at a computer. Of course we still have a long way
to go to enfranchise the majority of the world's population.
4. Avant-garde or Utopia or SF ? Since the early 1900s, many ideas
and theories, which have provided new and innovative solutions to represent
art, have been practiced to shape the characteristics of what we call
the "Modern Art" today. From the invention of Camera to the Video Art
by Paik Nam Joon and from Mail Art to Internet Art, the Media Art is
continuously developing its paradigm. What role does NetArt play in
contributing to this developing paradigm? And what are some objectives
that NetArt aims to achieve?
I don't think I would like to personify NetArt as having its own
aims. Sounds too controlled to me, I must be more anarchic. But I think
one of its key distinguishing dimensions is the potential for interacting
with a whole world diverse audience. This is what makes internet discussion
lists so new as well. The openess and extent of the potential communication
refreshes it. There is less risk of preaching to the converted, or of
being incestuous with one's audience.
5. NETWORK COMMUNICATION vs. NATURAL COMMUNICATION In modern society,
people exchange their ideas through electronic communication devices,
such as telephone, computer and etc. However, before the invention of
those devices, the only way to communicate with each other was through
conversation, body language and etc. Please tell us the differences
between modern network communication and natural communication.
Help, what a question. No communication system is perfect. People
adapt to what they have. There is more weight certainly put on words
and marks on the screen, when body language is not available. But I
have little doubt that electronic language will evolve well beyond emoticons
and colour schemes to effectively convey meaning.
There is a much larger question here I think, and I am not claiming
expertise in it. But if language develops to allow cleaner and clearer
communication of meaning between people, will this also affect the way
that people think within as well. Will we lose diversity not only of
culture and social practices, but also of internal thought and reflection?
I think it might. Individuality might suffer. I don't think I want to
be in the vanguard. Artists will be even more important.
6. Network Neo Imperialism or central power system. Network is centrally
controlled and organized. In other words, if the central power system
is down or not working for any reasons, all the connected systems would
not work and many of the big central systems are owned and run by politically
powerful nations, such as the US. Please talk about the political implications
on network controlling ownership and its influences in the world.
I think I might pass on this one.
I am not greatly interested in conspiracy theories when I don't
think there is sufficient conscious understanding by the "conspirators"
to support wilful intent. The drivers of change are interesting in themselves
without needing to put people's faces or Freudian desires in the firing
line.
7. Most of the countries in the world, especially those in Asia and
in Africa, do not use English as their first language. However, the
Internet network system is all written and translated in English and
it's becoming "the" language of all. Please tell us how you think about
this issue.
I like it, but then I was born and bred in Australia. Seriously
I think the battles of preserving cultural and intellectual diversity
should not be fought in terms of national languages. More provocatively
perhaps I don't even think they should be fought too strongly in geographic
terms. I think the diversity of a century or two ahead will be far less
geographically based than now.
8. Internet and Life There are many positive changes caused by the
development of the web. However, some people predict and worry about
the negative aspects. In fact, one of the popular commercial copy captions
in Korea says that, in the future, schools will disappear because of
the popularization of the use of the Internet. What do you think about
the influences of Internet in everyday life?
I am positive on the whole. I am very interested in education, and
see significant potential for the internet to be used to differentiate
the education of children according to their particular needs, without
the current economic constraint of needing to treat children in age-based
groups, often of thirty or more, as if they were relatively homongenous.
The internet supports a more differentiated and self-directed education,
whether this be of school-age children or adults in later life.
9. Please list the names of the artists or the titles of ongoing projects
and exhibitions you wish to recommend.
I don't think I am up-to-date enough to want to answer this one.
10. Please feel free to write any comments or ideas.
The only thing I would comment here about is access to creative
works on the internet. I am not talking about technical issues of bandwidth
or software compatibility, important though they are. What concerns
me is the lack of discussion about how the individual, idiosyncratic
creative works are going to be found. How will I find the work of someone
who I have never heard of, doing something relatively undefined? This
could be someone next door or on the other side of the planet.
Search engines work fairly well with well-defined keywords, though
commercialisation pressures ("pay for higher rankings") threaten their
impartiality. But new creative works are by definition not well-defined.
They are also not generally fronted by an economic or government entity
that might serve as a suitable gateway for those interested in finding
new works. I hope that organisations such as IDAF will connect with
other similar organisations to provide this kind of gateway - a loosely
categorised(!) and annotated(!) directory where new artists can list
their material. This needs a low level of oversight to maintain a good
signal to noise ratio, but otherwise could be a largely self-service
submission arrangement.
Thank you. Best wishes for the event.
David
--------------------------------
David Farmer
http://www.austega.com/interactive/
Austega Pty Ltd
--------------------------------